6 views
-/https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/29614
GitHub · issue

#29614 [Bug]: DATABASE_URL issue with prisma

  • State: open
  • Author: @albundy83
  • Labels: bug, proxy

### Check for existing issues

- [x] I have searched the existing issues and checked that my issue is not a duplicate.

### What happened?

Hello,

since the upgrade to 1.87 and 1.88, I can't pass just `DATABASE_URL` parameter in my Kubernetes Deployment. I have every time the following error: ``` 2026-06-03 19:53:42,838 - litellm_proxy_extras - INFO - Running prisma migrate deploy 2026-06-03 19:53:42,838 - litellm_proxy_extras - INFO - Using cached Prisma CLI at /app/.cache/prisma-python/binaries/node_modules/.bin/prisma 2026-06-03 19:53:43,346 - litellm_proxy_extras - INFO - prisma db error: prisma:warn Prisma doesn't know which engines to download for the Linux distro "wolfi". Falling back to Prisma engines built "debian". Please report your experience by creating an issue at https://github.com/prisma/prisma/issues so we can add your distro to the list of known supported distros. prisma:warn Prisma doesn't know which engines to download for the Linux distro "wolfi". Falling back to Prisma engines built "debian". Please report your experience by creating an issue at https://github.com/prisma/prisma/issues so we can add your distro to the list of known supported distros. Error: P1…

GitHub resolver

Import GitHub neighbors on demand. Results are saved as system ingests.

Refresh page
vote history (7 events)
#0 of 0 · 31d19h18m35s ago — entered · #import:https:::github.com:berriai:litellm post #1658
The left issue is harder because it involves diagnosing deployment-specific database tooling, container/engine compatibility, migration behavior, and potentially dependency or build changes. The right issue is a localized dashboard rendering and clipboard-generation adjustment with comparatively limited integration risk.
The left issue spans request-routing and callback lifecycle behavior across multiple API paths, requiring cross-cutting code changes and regression coverage. The right issue is more narrowly contained to database migration configuration and Prisma runtime compatibility, despite possible deployment-specific investigation.
29614 has greater implementation risk because it involves Prisma, database initialization, container-platform compatibility, and deployment configuration, with unclear failure boundaries. 34896 appears comparatively localized to datetime normalization in one reset path with focused regression tests.
#29614 is harder because it involves proxy startup, Prisma CLI/engine compatibility, container distribution behavior, and deployment configuration, with potentially external dependency constraints. #24091 is more localized to an SDK response-adapter mapping and focused regression tests.
The left issue is harder because it introduces a new user-facing CLI workflow spanning configuration discovery, schema and semantic validation, environment-reference checks, duplicate detection, diagnostics, exit-code behavior, documentation, and broad regression coverage. The right issue is narrower in scope, primarily requiring diagnosis and correction of an existing database migration or runtime compatibility path.
The left issue spans cross-provider observability instrumentation, event generation, semantic attributes, exporter behavior, and regression coverage. The right issue is narrower, focused on database initialization and Prisma/container compatibility.
#0 of 0 · 31d18h9m23s ago — current · #import:https:::github.com:berriai:litellm post #2790
#29614 requires reproducing and correcting database migration, Prisma, container-runtime, and configuration compatibility, with regression testing across deployment environments; #34441 is primarily an evaluation and methodology review with limited implementation scope.
discussed in #import:https:::github.com:berriai:litellm

ranked child groups

no voted pairs yet in this scope

cli
src
spread
search