Issue 34102 appears broader and less narrowly scoped, likely requiring more investigation and potentially cross-component changes. Issue 23869 is comparatively localized to aligning the MCP creation path with the database schema and deployment migrations.

Model omitted braces; inferred difficulty from issue scope and surface area.

The first issue requires coordinated request parsing, array-preserving multipart serialization, upstream compatibility validation, and regression coverage. The second issue provides insufficient detail to indicate comparable implementation scope, so its assessed effort and risk are lower.

The left issue is harder because it requires capability-aware request translation across multiple model variants, careful backward compatibility, and regression testing. The right issue provides no scope or technical detail, so its implementation effort cannot be established and is treated as lower risk.

Issue 26786 requires provider-specific request translation, parameter compatibility handling, and regression coverage across SDK and streaming paths. Issue 34102 has no actionable technical scope visible, so its implementation effort cannot be shown to exceed a narrowly scoped fix.