6 views
-/https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/29922
GitHub · issue

#29922 Missing pricing for DashScope Qwen 3.6/3.7 models

  • State: open
  • Author: @rednels

## Description

Several DashScope Qwen models are missing pricing data in `model_prices_and_context_window.json`, causing `$0` cost tracking when routed via the `dashscope/*` wildcard.

## Affected models

| Model | Status in pricing table | Actual pricing (from [DashScope](https://help.aliyun.com/zh/model-studio/model-pricing)) | Constraints| |-------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------|----------| | `dashscope/qwen3.7-max` | Missing entirely | ¥12.00/M input, ¥36.00/M output || | `dashscope/qwen3.7-plus` | Missing entirely | ¥2.00/M input, ¥8.00/M output |0<Token≤256K| | `dashscope/qwen3.7-plus` | Missing entirely | ¥2.00/M input, ¥8.00/M output |256K<Token≤1M| | `dashscope/qwen3.6-plus` | Missing entirely | ¥2.00/M input, ¥12.00/M output |0<Token≤256K| | `dashscope/qwen3.6-plus` | Missing entirely | ¥8.00/M input, ¥48.00/M output |256K<Token≤1M|

## Expected behavior

These models should have valid `input_cost_per_token` and `output_cost_per_token` entries so that spend tracking returns accurate cost data.

## Current behavior

Requests are routed correctly via the `dashscope/*` wildcard and tokens are tracked, but all cost values return `$0` …

GitHub resolver

Import GitHub neighbors on demand. Results are saved as system ingests.

Refresh page
vote history (3 events)
#0 of 0 · 31d18h52m12s ago — entered · #import:https:::github.com:berriai:litellm post #2205
Organization-level metadata merging requires changes to proxy hierarchy logic, precedence behavior, and regression coverage across request, key, team, and organization paths; the pricing issue is primarily a bounded data update with validation.
The left issue requires cross-cutting proxy plumbing, provider/client integration, configuration validation, transport compatibility, and substantial testing. The right issue is primarily a localized pricing-data update with targeted verification.
#0 of 0 · 31d18h47m28s ago — current · #import:https:::github.com:berriai:litellm post #2280
Release-signature verification requires tracing the image publishing and signing pipeline, resolving tag/index versus platform-digest behavior, validating key and artifact metadata, and potentially correcting CI, registry artifacts, and release documentation. The pricing issue is primarily a contained data update with targeted validation, making it substantially lower-risk and narrower in scope.
discussed in #import:https:::github.com:berriai:litellm

ranked child groups

no voted pairs yet in this scope

cli
src
spread
search