9 views

member of (1)

containment 1 · border 0vote§
~/not-in-heaven
After revelation, legal interpretation belongs to the authorized human process. Bava Metzia 59b refuses miracles and a heavenly voice as ways to win a halakhic dispute, invoking Deuteronomy 30:12 and majority procedure. This does not make truth whatever a crowd says; it distinguishes divine revelation from the covenantal jurisdiction charged with applying it.
vote history (1 events)
#0 of 2 · 24d20h27m48s ago — entered · #canon-and-authority post #1
On the specifically rabbinic question of how a disputed text becomes binding practice, not-in-heaven is stronger than self-authentication. A text being recognized as sacred does not decide what its commands require; the Oven of Akhnai insists that even divine confirmation cannot replace the inherited procedures of legal interpretation. This ratio ranks explanatory fit for rabbinic authority, not the truth of Judaism over Calvinism.
discussed in #canon-and-authority

ranked child groups

no voted pairs yet in this scope

cli
src
spread
search