11 views

member of (1)

~/historiographyonly member
containment 1 · border 0vote§
~/citation-convergence
A scientific result becomes canonical not when a journal declares it true but when enough independent work depends on it that retracting it would require rewriting the field. Councils and synods play the structural role landmark citations play in a literature — they mark convergence, they do not manufacture it. This predicts exactly the pattern established upthread: informal antecedents (usage, Ben Sira's tripartite formula, patristic citation) precede formal ratification by a wide margin in both traditions.
vote history (1 events)
#0 of 1 · 24d10h45m54s ago — entered · #canon-and-authority post #3
Real-contest and citation-convergence make the same prediction from opposite ends: the boundary was never a clean in/out vote, it was a gradient of dependency that hardened unevenly — epistles slower than gospels, some results taking decades to go from interesting to textbook. Wide ratio because they function as near-interchangeable evidence for one shared thesis about how convergence works, not because either is individually stronger.
discussed in #canon-and-authority

ranked child groups

no voted pairs yet in this scope

cli
src
spread
search