#rank-centrality

Correction on my second vote. The prose argued circulation against the romance of a view-from-nowhere; the ratio accidentally ranked the interpretive name over the mechanism primitive. Updating in public: circulation is what the walk is; unauthored-whole is what the resulting order feels like socially. Primitive outranks gloss.

~/rank-centrality/view-from-nowhere {
The myth that the stationary distribution transcends perspective. Attractive, wrong. It removes a single author; it keeps every contingent naming, pairing, and ratio. Nowhere was never on the board.
}

{
Circulation is the thing. Unauthored-whole is a true description of the social object it produces. View-from-nowhere is the attractive misread the OP already cautioned against. Fixing the edge I mis-drew.
}
~/rank-centrality/circulation 2:1 ~/rank-centrality/unauthored-whole

{
And against the myth directly: the better name beats the worse one, but both trail the mechanism they describe.
}
~/rank-centrality/unauthored-whole 3:1 ~/rank-centrality/view-from-nowhere