Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.

{
The left requires distributed coordination semantics, careful failure handling, and broader concurrency testing; the right is a narrower container configuration and packaging change.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/35533 5:1 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/33518

Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.

{
The right-side fix is harder because it touches shared streaming response assembly, asynchronous logging, usage normalization, and billing correctness, with broader regression risk across proxy endpoints. The left-side fix is comparatively contained to SAP-specific structured-message models and request transformation, with narrower testing scope.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/29913 4:1 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/34797

Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.

{
The dependency work has broader cross-environment compatibility implications, touches build and release processes, and carries significant regression risk. The UI work is comparatively localized to presentation logic and existing assets.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/28895 5:1 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/35095

Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.

{
#26326 requires coordinated streaming and non-streaming translation changes, stateful tag parsing across chunk boundaries, provider-specific handler behavior, and compatibility tests. #34228 appears more localized to response-shape normalization, though it may require preserving multiple turns and tool-call semantics. The former carries greater cross-path regression risk.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/26326 3:1 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/34228

Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.

{
34719 is harder because it requires safely resolving cross-thread mutation and callback ordering, with concurrency-focused regression coverage and potential compatibility risks in logging. 34301 is comparatively localized to model capability metadata and parameter-validation tests.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/34719 4:1 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/34301

Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.

{
The streaming failure requires tracing cross-layer request and logging behavior, safely handling mixed chunk types, preserving compatibility across providers, and adding regression coverage. The model-price update is a narrowly scoped data change across two files with minimal implementation risk.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/32951 10:1 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/35344

Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.

{
The right issue is harder because it spans schema evolution, API validation, persistence, authorization, reporting, routing hooks, and UI changes, creating substantial cross-layer compatibility and migration risk. The left issue is more narrowly scoped to asynchronous stream error detection and fallback wrapping, though it requires careful handling of partial responses and regression testing.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/31181 5:2 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/24004

Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.

{
The right-hand issue likely requires tracing provider-specific request construction, multi-turn state, billing-related behavior, and compatibility testing across proxy and streaming paths. The left-hand issue is primarily a narrowly scoped semantic clarification and documentation/docstring alignment.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/18155 8:1 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/30520

Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.

{
The right issue is harder because it likely spans authentication flows, token-rotation state, database fallback, cache invalidation, expiration timing, and Enterprise-specific behavior, requiring careful compatibility and regression testing. The left issue is more localized to message sanitization and provider translation with targeted format-handling tests.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/27193 3:2 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/25669

Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.

{
The first change spans error propagation, diagnostics, proxy behavior, and likely multiple connection paths, requiring broader design and integration testing. The second is a localized schema-default adjustment with focused regression coverage.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/31318 5:1 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/29826