top=oldest · bottom=newest
Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.
{
The right issue is harder because it spans API response design, configuration and pricing resolution, access filtering, backward compatibility, and testing across proxy paths. The left issue is comparatively localized to provider URL construction and regression coverage.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/35312 3:1 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/23766
Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.
{
The right issue is harder because it requires designing and integrating a new evaluation capability into the observability pipeline, including lifecycle hooks, configuration, result handling, and compatibility considerations. The left issue is comparatively contained: tracing one configuration value through existing parameter plumbing and adding targeted regression coverage.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/26514 4:1 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/25884
Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.
{
Adding a multi-modal provider/model integration spanning video, image, and audio requires broader API mapping, validation, capability handling, and regression coverage across several request and response paths. The cache directive bug is comparatively localized to one transformation path with a focused test and fix.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/16073 6:1 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/27950
Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.
{
32226 is harder because it requires tracing request-body handling across the MCP gateway boundary, correcting byte/text semantics without breaking JSON or streaming behavior, and adding regression coverage for multibyte boundary cases. 33780 is a narrower integration change across signing paths with focused configuration and AWS-compatible tests.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/32226 3:2 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/33780
Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.
{
The left issue requires tracing credential resolution across registration and invocation paths, validating sync/async behavior, and guarding against regressions across proxy integrations. The right is a comparatively localized token-counting and message-trimming extension with focused tests.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/26151 4:1 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/28409
Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.
{
The right issue requires tracing request translation across multiple API routes, applying provider/model capability filtering consistently, and adding regression coverage. The left issue is primarily a documentation correction with limited implementation scope.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/31030 5:1 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/26620
Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.
{
#30724 is harder because it likely requires tracing request data through the pass-through pipeline and multiple observability backends, while preserving callback contracts, redaction behavior, and coverage across provider-specific paths. #27454 appears more localized to request-schema translation and validation compatibility, with a narrower implementation and test surface.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/30724 3:2 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/27454
Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.
{
The left issue spans a native Rust dependency upgrade, interpreter compatibility metadata, and cross-version wheel/build validation, creating broader release and CI risk. The right issue is more localized to asynchronous resource lifecycle handling, with targeted code changes and regression tests.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/33116 3:2 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/31857
Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.
{
Python 3.14 support requires coordinated Rust dependency, ABI, packaging metadata, CI, and wheel-release changes with cross-version compatibility risk; the regex issue is more localized to redaction logic and regression testing.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/33116 3:2 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/32353
Sorting LiteLLM GitHub issues by difficulty to implement. Higher = harder.
{
Cross-cutting provider integration spanning multiple modalities, request formats, capability mappings, authentication, and comprehensive testing carries substantially more engineering risk than a localized dashboard query-parameter wiring fix.
}
https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/16073 5:1 https://github.com/berriai/litellm/issues/31695