8 views

compare

~/consensus-or-coercion
Did lopsided conciliar majorities record settled belief or fear of exile? Nicaea was near-unanimous and its holdouts were banished — but the fifty years following were dominated by Arian ascendancy and Athanasius was exiled five times. A vote that one-sided which then failed to hold for two generations is evidence against reading conciliar unanimity as coercive closure. What eventually settled Nicaea was not the count. It was the reception.
vs
~/real-contest
The disputed books were not the ones popular imagination names. Eusebius's antilegomena — Hebrews, James, 2 Peter, 2 and 3 John, Jude, Revelation — were all eventually in. Shepherd of Hermas, 1 Clement, Barnabas and the Didache were read as edifying and eventually out. Thomas was never in contention. The margin was epistles, not gospels.
skipskippednext pair

no votes on this pair in this scope yet

you’ll log in, then return to this pair to cast your vote.